Dear Challenge Organizers, Could you please clarify the increase in the number of enriched modules (NS) in your baseline methods submitted to Round 1 leaderboard. They have nearly doubled, and we are trying to understand if the change is due to the new scoring script or if you have used new results here. Kind regards, Suhas Srinivasan

Created by Suhas Srinivasan suhassrinivasan
Thank you for the reply.   Kind regards, Suhas
Thank you for the reply.   Kind regards, Suhas
We are looking at different baselines, such as random modules and off-the-shelf module identification methods. We will not release an official baseline before the challenge ends. Teams who make a serious effort and actively participate in the leaderboard rounds are very likely to outperform the baseline. --daniel
Dear Dr. Marbach,   Thank you for clarifying about the scoring. Also when would the official baseline be released?   Kind regards, Suhas Srinivasan
Yes, the only thing that changed is the scoring script (the background set of genes to compute enrichment). As explained in [this post](syn6156761/discussion/threadId=718) this can have a strong effect on results and the scores from the test round are thus invalid and should be ignored. **Of note, these were just two internal test submissions and not the official baseline of the challenge.** Best, Daniel

Request information on baseline results in Round 1 page is loading…